The Great Montreal Rebuild

This native advertising series combines Concordia University‘s expertise and the Montreal Gazette‘s talent, and appeared as part of the newspaper’s special reports for “Montreal Reimagined.” Taking on urban development in Montreal, I was tasked with exploring the diversity of disciplines that could rebuild our great city. The series was published over 10 weeks, with pieces appearing in the print newspaper, on the web, and on iPad, complete with infographics and videos. Photo by La Portraitiste.

Climate Change, Renewable Energy and Infrastructures (published March 2, 2015)
“Can we confront climate change in a way that’s meaningful enough to make a difference? ‘The challenge is big,’ Prof. Damon Matthews said. ‘There’s no single solution, but there are lots of little solutions.’ That’s why the focus for a number of researchers in Montreal is developing solutions to reduce the impact of climate change.”
Read more

Solar Energy Powering Montreal’s Bright future (published March 6, 2015)
“Whether it’s in a commercial building or a single-family home, this intelligent technology goes further, making sure occupants stay comfortable — and even predicting the next day’s weather conditions to modify the building’s heat or cooling controls accordingly. Notably, these smart, solar-powered buildings can be designed to store energy.”
Read more

Paving the Way for Sustainable Housing Development (published March 16, 2015)
“Despite the city of Montreal’s moratorium on condo conversions in the early 1980s, a loophole has allowed a new condo category to emerge.What Rutland and his colleagues discovered was that in Petite-Patrie, more than half of the condo conversions since 1991 were “undivided” co-ownerships. Traditionally, undivided co-ownership has provided a way for people to own a part or share of an overall building. Since 1994, however, it has become possible for these shares to be linked to particular housing units within the building. The units of the building can then be bought, sold, and lived in very much like a divided co-ownership. Most significantly, the undivided condo category is not covered by the moratorium, making the protective policy increasingly irrelevant.”
Read more

Building a Social Economy: Sustainability from Within (published March 20, 2015)
“Take the story of Marmite, the concentrated yeast spread commonly used in the U.K. Love it or hate it, this byproduct of beer brewing combines corporate responsibility and waste reduction by turning something that would normally be a leftover into something that has value in its own right.”
Read more

From Lab to Market: Investing in Montreal’s Scientific Sectors (published March 30, 2015)
“Investing in research is crucial to making sure Canada remains one of the top five leading countries in aerospace. According to Aéro Montréal, most of Quebec’s 43,500 aerospace jobs are in Greater Montreal, making the city the second world capital in terms of aerospace job density.”
Read more

Montreal’s Makes the Most of Its Creative Resources (published April 3, 2015)
“It’s not surprising that Montreal was appointed to UNESCO City of Design in 2006. The city is teeming with creativity, starting with about 500 film and TV production and distribution companies, 70 ad agencies, 25 cinemas, at least 23 theatre venues, and 12 Maison de la culture establishments. Not to mention that Montreal hosts countless festivals, and is home to myriad architects, designers in all capacities, musicians, and artists. Montreal certainly has a creative drive, but what does this unique sector of our economy need to continue to thrive?”
Read more

The Impact of Public Transportation on Neighbourhood Development (published April 13, 2015)
“Public transportation exists to provide affordable mobility, connecting Montrealers not just to their city, but to friends and family, and, in many cases, their jobs. At the same time, recent research suggests Montreal’s métro may have contributed to the changing demographic composition of surrounding neighbourhoods; in other words, gentrification.”
Read more

The Wellington Tower’s Living Legacy (published April 17, 2015)
“If we’ve all but forgotten Griffintown’s St. Ann’s Church or its old fire station, it may be because the new residential highrises in the area leave little clue as to this tiny neighbourhood’s former industrial identity. Not everything’s gone, but in 2013, when the city announced its plans to redesign the Wellington Tower — that iconic, graffitied, minimalistic building hovering above the CN tracks bordering the Lachine Canal — a group of people decided it was time to start making memories.”
Read more

Creating Green Space Diversity and Connectivity (published April 27, 2015)
“It’s estimated that roughly 20 per cent of Canadians suffer from respiratory allergies. But according to biodiversity and bioenergy specialist Melanie McCavour, a PhD candidate and lecturer at Concordia, there’s an easy, inexpensive, and effective thing cities could do to both increase biodiversity and alleviate those allergy symptoms: Plant more female trees that produce fruit.”
Read more

Perfect Blue: Facing Montreal’s Waterways (published May 1, 2015)
“Central city dwellers know that they’re surrounded by water, but they often don’t have much of a relationship with it. Unlike cities like Paris, London, Berlin, and Prague, there’s no body of water cutting through Montreal’s urban core. The Lachine Canal is an offshoot of the St. Lawrence, but it’s still largely at the edge of the island, and as a public space, it doesn’t yet compare to the Seine or the Thames.”
Read more

Oh, the carnage

A couple of days ago, the boyfriend unit sent me this bit of news, and if it’s actually possible, it could change everything.

Okay, don’t click the link. Here’s the skinny: scientists have found a way to slow the process of aging in fruit flies. They plan to move to bigger and better test subjects. If all works out well–for the scientists–experts say it’s possible that humans could well live to be 1,000 years old.

Says Robert Freitas at the Institute for Molecular Manufacturing, a non-profit, nanotech group in Palo Alto, California, “There are many, many different components of ageing and we are chipping away at all of the . It will take time and, if you put it in terms of the big developments of modern technology, say the telephone, we are still about 10 years off from Alexander Graham Bell shouting to his assistant through that first device. Still, in the near future, say the next two to four decades, the disease of aging will be cured.”

Naturally, both religious and scientific communities are in an uproar over this research. Not everyone thinks aging needs to be cured, while others argue that death is a saving grace for an already over-populated planet. And that doesn’t even begin to touch upon the psychological repurcussions of immortality.

Personally, I think we’re not designed for that kind of longevity, and faking it could have enormous consequences. Still, when the boyfriend unit brought it up over drinks, it made for some interesting speculations. What if we were able to live to be 1,000 years old? Here are a few things that came up.

No more marriage

Seriously, what’s the point? We’d outgrow the partnership by the end of a century, if not sooner. We might as well get used to the fact that we’d probably be able to tolerate several different partners, but definitely not just the one. Can you imagine spending 900 years with the same person? Yeah, neither can I. Marriage works on the premise that the time we spend on this planet, and with our partner, is limited. It’s kind of a bonus. Like, wouldn’t it be nice to spend the rest of the time I have here with you? If that time becomes quasi-limitless, it seems we’d have to come to terms with the temporary nature of our romantic attention span.

How long would I be 25?

I don’t care if it’s shallow, I want to know the real-time equivalent of a century. I mean, if I spend 900 years looking and feeling 100, I don’t want any part of it. And that’s the real question, isn’t it? If we slow the process of aging, and each century equals, say, a decade, does that mean it’ll take over 200 years for me to get my shit together? Does that mean I’ll spend 100 years being a child? And how am I developing psychologically? If emotional and neurological development are tied to one’s physiology, does that mean I’d spend 50 years as an overreactive teenager? If so, forget it! Adolescence is something I don’t wish to stretch out (or relive). Ever.

More time for stuff

One thing’s for sure, you can fathom checking off most items from that “things to do before I die” list. Even if we’re slowing down the process of aging, that doesn’t change the measure of time. A day still last 24 hours, and with more of these units in our lives, why not backpack through Europe, audition for a Hollywood movie (even though you can’t act), and learn the banjo! Though I’m against the idea, the prospect of living (almost)  forever invites the fancy of doing a bunch of things I keep thinking I don’t have the time to do. For my part, I’d get a bunch of university degrees, just for the frak of it. I’d finish my music degree, I’d get a Master’s in English, and I’d also take architecture or urban planning (or both). I’d devote more time to filmmaking and art, since I wouldn’t be too worried about paying off my student loan. After all, I do have 700 years to get out of debt.

Homicidal territoriality

On the flip side, even if our bodies and minds are aging at a slower rate, I wonder how we’d tolerate living in such a chaotic and unjust society for that long. Isn’t that a recipe for utter madness? If I’m against the idea of living to be 1,000, it’s mostly because there are many things about this life that I can’t stand, and I’m not sure they’d be erased with agelessness. I hate how humans can be so inexplicably xenophobic and selfish. With more years to work on a plan, couldn’t one society ostensibly exact the genocide of another? Would immortality make us more peaceful or  war-mongering? I can’t help but think that with more of us inhabiting the planet as a result of agelessness, we’d start to feel crowded and ultimately get grouchy, claustrophobic and territorial. I’m not saying this because I’m cynical. Science and anthropology combined make a case for this. While we can’t explain why we behave that way, we undeniably do. And human nature–if such a thing exists and if this is how it is manifest–is not a disease that can be cured. I want to believe that we learn that behaviour, but when something is this consistent, we usually classify it as observable phenomena. And that’s nature.

***

And what about you? What do you think of agelessness? Is it a catastrophic notion or something that would solve most of your problems?